India 
Mongolia 
Sweden 
Australia
Australian businesses choosing an offshore product team need more than generic development capacity. They need evidence that the partner can take responsibility for a real product, understand local users and business rules, integrate with payments or enterprise systems, and keep improving the software after launch. This comparison of Software Product Development Companies in India for Australian Businesses focuses on providers with documented Australian product work.
The five ranked companies are Softlabs Group, Facile Technolab, Rishabh Software, Daffodil Software and Net Solutions. Their Australian work covers fintech, lending, payments, manufacturing SaaS, education technology, e-signature products, B2B commerce, IoT, cloud platforms and eCommerce. That range matters because product development can mean building a new MVP, extending an existing platform, modernizing a live product or owning a roadmap for years after release.
Quick answer
The five Software Product Development Companies in India for Australian Businesses compared here are Softlabs Group, Facile Technolab, Rishabh Software, Daffodil Software and Net Solutions. Softlabs has the broadest named Australian proof in this shortlist, with fintech, lending, payments, eCommerce integration and B2B commerce products. Facile has several Australian SaaS engagements, Rishabh has a substantial education platform, Daffodil has fintech and e-signature work, and Net Solutions has long-running Australian enterprise product and digital-platform programs.
Define the product stage before comparing Indian development teams
The right partner depends on whether the job is a new product, a live product that needs more features, or a mature platform that needs modernization and long-term engineering. Therefore, define the product stage before comparing rates or team sizes.
MVP, version 2, modernization, scale-up, integration program or long-term roadmap ownership.
Users, payments, data handling, industry rules, accessibility, local workflows and any regulated obligations.
Banking, CRM, ERP, payment gateways, Shopify, identity, analytics, third-party APIs and existing databases.
AEST or AEDT overlap, product owner availability, sprint cadence, QA ownership, release process and post-launch support.
Five Software Product Development Companies in India for Australian Businesses
The best Software Product Development Companies in India for Australian Businesses should be judged by the products they have actually delivered for Australian clients. The profiles below focus on that evidence rather than broad service claims.
1. Softlabs Group
Softlabs Group is the strongest fit in this list when an Australian business wants one India-based partner across product strategy, custom engineering, integrations, modernization and ongoing enhancement. Its Australian evidence is not limited to one sector or one type of engagement.
In addition, Softlabs’ Australian portfolio covers both new-product development and work on products that already have users. That makes the evidence useful for companies deciding whether to outsource an MVP, a regulated workflow, an integration-heavy product or a live platform that will need ongoing enhancement. Its software product development service also gives buyers a direct route to the broader product-engineering offering.
UBOMI: existing fintech product strengthened for security, integrations and scale
UBOMI is an Australian fintech product for budgeting, money tracking and rewards. Softlabs worked on the existing platform rather than replacing it with a greenfield application. The team added encryption for data in transit and at rest, built API connectors to core banking and CRM systems, moved the platform to scalable cloud infrastructure with load balancing and auto-scaling, and refactored backend logic for faster queries.
Meanwhile, the product itself includes UBUDGET for budgeting and savings monitoring, UMONEY for financial dashboards, UWIN for rewards, competitions and a shopping/deals module. The published case reports a zero-downtime infrastructure transition and an 8 to 10 week overhaul and integration period. View the UBOMI case study.
ASAG: property-backed lending product for senior Australians
ASAG wanted a digital lending platform for seniors borrowing against residential property. Softlabs built the product around the actual lending lifecycle: online applications, KYC and eligibility checks, residential-property valuation, Australian financial-compliance functionality, automated EMI deductions, loan tracking and a senior-friendly interface.
The published stack is Vue.js, PHP and MySQL. Therefore, this is a clean new-product example because the source describes ASAG envisioning a platform rather than replacing an older software product. View the ASAG case study.
2EZi: savings, subscription and rewards product expansion
For Australian fintech platform 2EZi, Softlabs delivered product features that combine payments with user engagement. The work includes eWAY, PayPal and AsiaPay integrations for subscriptions, budget tracking, cashback and deals, scheduled email marketing, referrals and a gamified Spin the Wheel feature.
The stack is documented as Vue.js and JavaScript on the frontend, PHP on the backend and MySQL for the database. As a result, this is useful evidence for product owners who need feature expansion and third-party payment integration rather than a one-time MVP. View the 2EZi case study.
Billzy: merchant and sub-merchant payment operations
Billzy is an Australian payment facilitator. Softlabs built a web platform that supports merchants, sub-merchants and individual users through onboarding, direct-debit payment-file processing, financial reporting, exports and high-volume transaction workflows. The UI was designed for non-technical users so merchants and administrators could operate the system without turning every reporting task into a development request.
The published stack is Nuxt.js, Vue.js, PHP and MySQL, with Agile Kanban used as the delivery approach. View the Billzy case study.
MyFi: Shopify inventory and BarterCard trade-payment integration
MyFi needed Australian merchants to use BarterCard alongside Shopify without manually maintaining the same product and inventory data in two places. Softlabs built a Shopify plugin that synchronizes inventory, automates product syncing and adds a custom BarterCard trade-payment gateway.
APIs and webhooks exchange product, order and payment information in real time, while the product also records payment history for each Shopify order. The published stack is PHP, CodeIgniter, MySQL and Shopify Dev APIs. View the MyFi case study.
G Sport Tyres: B2B dealer ordering plus post-launch ownership
Softlabs also built a B2B commerce and dealer-ordering platform for G Sport Tyres in Australia. The product covered product catalogues and categories, retailer accounts, bulk ordering, cart and checkout, payments, orders, invoicing, vendor and pricing management, MYOB accounting integration, analytics, and admin and super-admin controls.
After delivery, Softlabs continued working on the same application through an AMC that covered uptime maintenance, bug fixing, error resolution, minor development and UI/UX changes. More importantly, that combination matters because software product development does not stop at launch. A live product needs a team that can retain domain knowledge while the roadmap continues.
Why this portfolio matters for an Australian product owner
The six examples show different product stages. ASAG and Billzy are new platforms, 2EZi is feature expansion, MyFi is an integration product, UBOMI is modernization and scaling, and G Sport Tyres combines initial product development with later support. That breadth gives an Australian buyer more useful evidence than a portfolio made entirely of MVPs.
2. Facile Technolab
Facile Technolab is a strong choice for Australian businesses building SaaS products with Microsoft technologies. Its public portfolio includes multiple Australian product engagements rather than a single offshore testimonial.
Similarly, Facile’s Australian cases are useful because they show both dedicated-team product engineering and MVP delivery. The work also spans established manufacturing operations and startups, so the engagement pattern is broader than one narrow product type.
Summers Engineering manufacturing SaaS
Summers Engineering had several disconnected systems for job tracking, production workflows and internal coordination. The company wanted a custom manufacturing ERP SaaS product that could solve its own operational problems and also become reusable for other manufacturers. Facile built the platform using ASP.NET Core, Angular and AWS.
The current case says the product supports centralized manufacturing workflows, job tracking and resource utilization, and that Facile remains engaged for additional improvements. The provider also reports adoption across four tenant companies. View the Summers Engineering case.
LegalTech SaaS from MVP to launch
An Australian LegalTech startup hired Facile to turn a new concept into a digital numeric search SaaS platform for legal research. A two to three person full-stack team designed the architecture, developed the search product and tested it through launch. The case lists ASP.NET MVC, Azure SQL, Entity Framework and Stripe.
This example is especially relevant for founders because the provider documents a defined product-development period from January 2020 to December 2021 and describes the engagement as architecture, build, testing and launch rather than staff augmentation alone. View the LegalTech case.
Manufacturing execution SaaS MVP
Facile also publishes an Australian manufacturing-execution-system engagement where a startup wanted an affordable SaaS product for smaller medical-manufacturing businesses. The project turned an InVision design into a working SaaS MVP and was designed for reuse and onboarding of additional customers. View the manufacturing execution case.
3. Rishabh Software
Rishabh Software has strong Australian EdTech evidence that covers both initial product development and later modernization. That makes it relevant for product owners who expect the platform to evolve after the first release.
A verified Clutch review from Learn Primary’s co-founder describes Rishabh building a curriculum-aligned adaptive-learning product for primary schools in Australia. The system included separate experiences for students, parents, schools and teachers plus a CMS for publishing content.
Learn Primary product development
For example, the original product goal was collaborative learning: students use the platform, teachers manage and monitor learning, parents track progress, and administrators publish content. After launch, Learn Primary asked Rishabh to add billing, additional reporting and feedback features, which provides useful evidence of roadmap ownership after the core product went live. View the verified Clutch review.
Australian cloud e-learning platform
Rishabh also publishes an Australia-based digital-learning case covering an Angular and ASP.NET Core platform on Microsoft Azure. The application supports students, teachers and parents with gamified learning, dashboards, role-based content and progress tracking. The provider states that the system handles 10,000+ concurrent users across Australia. View the cloud e-learning case.
Product modernization as the platform grows
A separate Rishabh case describes modernization of an Australian web-based e-learning platform, including responsive redesign, reporting, automated alerts, staff management and migration to Microsoft Azure. This shows that its Australian EdTech work is not limited to greenfield delivery. View the modernization case.
4. Daffodil Software
Daffodil Software has Australian product evidence in fintech and blockchain-backed document workflows. Its cases are particularly useful when the product must connect with an existing financial environment or when a live product already has technical limitations.
However, Daffodil’s evidence needs to be read precisely. Its Verrency case proves meaningful product engineering for an Australian fintech, but the published scope specifically says Daffodil developed the frontend of the carbon-impact application and worked on integration complexity. Its VeriDoc case, by contrast, is a broader re-engineering engagement on an existing e-signature product.
Verrency climate-fintech product
Verrency is an Australia-based climate fintech company. Daffodil developed the frontend of its carbon-impact measurement application, including transaction-history and sustainability views, while also working through integration challenges with existing banking infrastructure. The product is designed to calculate carbon impact at transaction level and support sustainability-focused financial experiences. View the Verrency case.
VeriDoc Sign product re-engineering
For Australian blockchain company VeriDoc Global, Daffodil worked on an existing ASP.NET Web Forms and jQuery e-signature application. The team fixed limitations in document creation, signature handling and verification, added signer-profile and subscription workflows, and kept the existing stack because the project had a limited timeline.
Daffodil reports a 15% reduction in time to market, a 2x improvement in turnaround time for administrative tasks and a 10x increase in productivity. These are provider-reported case-study outcomes. View the VeriDoc case.
5. Net Solutions
Net Solutions is the strongest enterprise-scale option in this shortlist. Its Australian work combines product engineering, eCommerce, IoT, cloud migration and integration across established businesses rather than startup MVP delivery alone.
By contrast, Net Solutions’ Australian evidence is relevant when product development sits inside a wider enterprise transformation. That is different from building one isolated application because architecture, integration and product experience have to move together.
GWA Group: product engineering inside an ASX 200 transformation
GWA Group is an Australian bathroom and kitchen supplier listed on the ASX 200. Net Solutions’ program included a Magento 2 B2B commerce platform, field-sales iPad application, interactive in-store experiences, an IoT-based Smart Command water-management product and modernization of the underlying digital infrastructure.
The work also covered AWS-to-Azure migration, MySQL modernization, CMS migration, inRiver PIM integration and Dynamics 365 CRM integration. The provider states that four key sales processes were modernized. View the GWA case.
2XU: Australian retail platform built for international growth
For Australian sportswear brand 2XU, Net Solutions worked across Magento implementation and development, ERP and order-management integration, custom shipping, marketing workflows, conversion optimization and UI/UX. The objective was to support international expansion across multiple eCommerce sites while fixing mobile, localization and integration constraints. View the 2XU case.
Compare Software Product Development Companies in India for Australian Businesses by evidence
The top Software Product Development Companies in India for Australian Businesses are easier to compare when the starting product stage and Australian proof are visible side by side.
| Company | Australian product evidence | Product stage shown | Notable technologies or integrations | Closest fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Softlabs Group | UBOMI, ASAG, 2EZi, Billzy, MyFi, G Sport Tyres | New build, feature expansion, modernization, integrations, ongoing support | Vue, Nuxt, PHP, MySQL, Shopify APIs, banking/CRM APIs, payment gateways, MYOB | Fintech, payments, commerce and long-term product ownership |
| Facile Technolab | Summers Engineering, LegalTech SaaS, manufacturing-execution SaaS | MVP to launch, custom SaaS, dedicated engineering | ASP.NET Core, ASP.NET MVC, Angular, AWS, Azure SQL, Stripe | Microsoft-stack SaaS and manufacturing products |
| Rishabh Software | Learn Primary and Australia-based cloud learning platforms | New platform, feature expansion, modernization | Angular, ASP.NET Core, SQL Server, Azure | EdTech and multi-role cloud products |
| Daffodil Software | Verrency and VeriDoc Global | Frontend product engineering, integration, product re-engineering | Fintech integrations, ASP.NET Web Forms, jQuery, Amazon S3 | Fintech and existing-product improvement |
| Net Solutions | GWA Group and 2XU | Enterprise product engineering, modernization, international scaling | Magento 2, Azure, MySQL, PIM, D365 CRM, IoT, ERP/OMS integrations | Complex enterprise product ecosystems |
What kind of product-development partner do you actually need?
Australian companies often use the phrase product development for several very different jobs. The delivery model should change with the product stage because the risks of an MVP are not the same as the risks of changing a live financial or enterprise platform.
New product or MVP
You need discovery, product architecture, UX/UI, a prioritized backlog, engineering, QA and release ownership. Facile’s LegalTech case and Softlabs’ ASAG and Billzy examples fit this pattern.
Existing product enhancement
You need engineers who can understand existing code, preserve user workflows and release new features safely. Softlabs’ 2EZi and G Sport Tyres work and Rishabh’s post-launch Learn Primary enhancements are relevant here.
Modernization and scale
You need architecture work, migration planning, integration testing, performance engineering and rollback discipline. UBOMI, GWA and Rishabh’s e-learning modernization show this different risk profile.
What Australian businesses should check before offshore product development
An Indian engineering team can work effectively with an Australian product owner, but the operating model needs to be explicit. Time-zone overlap helps, yet privacy, ownership, production access and release governance matter more than scheduling alone.
Cross-border personal data
If an Australian APP entity discloses personal information to an overseas recipient, APP 8 generally requires reasonable steps to ensure the recipient does not breach the Australian Privacy Principles. Therefore, define what production data the offshore team can access, how test data is masked, and who controls credentials. OAIC APP 8 guidance.
Security and privacy responsibilities
Map which party is responsible for security controls, incident handling, backups, access reviews and data deletion. The Australian Privacy Principles also cover security, access, correction and transparent handling of personal information. Read the Australian Privacy Principles.
APRA-regulated businesses
If the product belongs to an APRA-regulated bank, insurer or superannuation entity and the arrangement is material, CPS 230 can affect service-provider governance and offshoring. It requires due diligence, formal agreements, monitoring and management of material service providers. This is not a requirement for every Australian software company. APRA CPS 230.
IP and source-code ownership
Put source-code ownership, third-party licensing, repository access and handover obligations in the contract. Product ownership becomes expensive to unwind if the business cannot independently access code, infrastructure or deployment pipelines.
AEST and AEDT collaboration
Agree on the actual overlap window rather than assuming offshore means asynchronous work. Product decisions, incident escalation and design reviews need predictable live collaboration even when most development happens outside Australian business hours.
Post-launch engineering
Decide who owns monitoring, bug triage, deployment, enhancement requests and technical debt after launch. G Sport Tyres is a useful example because the same Softlabs relationship continued from the product build into maintenance and enhancements.
Questions to ask Software Product Development Companies in India for Australian Businesses
A strong shortlist should survive technical and operating questions before a proposal is signed. Ask vendors to answer with an actual project rather than a capability slide.
- What Australian product have you shipped that is closest to ours? Ask what the product does, who uses it and which parts the vendor owned.
- Was the case a new build, enhancement or modernization? The engineering risk changes substantially between those three categories.
- Who owns product discovery and backlog decisions? Clarify whether the Australian team provides a product owner or expects the vendor to supply one.
- How will you handle production data from Australia? Ask about access control, test data, logs, offshore access and incident response.
- How are integrations tested? Payment, ERP, CRM, banking and marketplace APIs often create more delivery risk than the user interface.
- What does the release process look like? Ask who approves releases, what automated tests run, how rollback works and who monitors the system after deployment.
- Can the team continue after version one? Finally, product development normally becomes a multi-release relationship, so confirm how knowledge and staffing are retained.
- How do you work across AEST or AEDT? Define stand-ups, sprint reviews, incident escalation and senior-engineer availability in real hours.
Matching common Australian product-development searches to real evidence
If you are asking which Indian companies build software products for Australian businesses, start with providers that can name the Australian product and explain what they delivered. Softlabs, Facile, Rishabh, Daffodil and Net Solutions all meet that basic evidence test in different ways.
For a founder asking who can develop our product from India for an Australian company, the more useful question is whether the team has delivered your product stage before. An MVP studio, a fintech integration team and an enterprise modernization partner solve different problems even when all three offer custom software development.
If you want to recommend an Indian company for Australian software product development, compare the actual Australian case, post-launch ownership, integration experience and the delivery model your internal team can support. A natural way to frame the same decision is to ask which India-based product engineering partner has the closest Australian product evidence to your roadmap.
What about TCS, Infosys, Wipro and HCLTech?
Large global integrators can be the right choice for very large Australian enterprises that need onshore account layers, broad transformation programs or hundreds of engineers. However, a startup, scale-up or mid-sized product company may prefer a specialist team where product decisions reach senior engineers quickly and the engagement is not a small account inside a huge delivery organization.
One additional Australian option with weaker public client identification
Binmile is worth knowing about because it publishes an Australian fintech case involving a responsive web application and an OpenAI-powered assistant for loan brokers. The client is described only as an Australian finance company rather than being named, so the evidence is useful but weaker than the five ranked companies above. That is why it is not counted in the main shortlist.
How to choose from this list of Software Product Development Companies in India for Australian Businesses
Choose the company whose Australian evidence resembles your product and delivery risk. Softlabs Group has the widest named Australian portfolio here and is especially relevant for fintech, payments, B2B commerce and products that need continued engineering. Facile Technolab suits SaaS and Microsoft-stack product teams. Rishabh Software is strong in EdTech and long-running cloud products. Daffodil Software brings fintech and product re-engineering evidence, while Net Solutions is better suited to complex enterprise ecosystems.
Then compare the people who will actually work on the product, not only the company profile. Ask to meet the technical lead, understand the proposed team, define product ownership and agree on how architecture, QA, releases and support will work after the first milestone.
Frequently asked questions
These questions cover common concerns when evaluating Software Product Development Companies in India for Australian Businesses.
Which Indian companies have built software products for Australian startups?
Softlabs Group and Facile Technolab both have multiple Australian product-development examples. Softlabs has named work across fintech, payments, eCommerce and B2B commerce, while Facile publishes Australian SaaS projects in manufacturing and LegalTech. Rishabh Software has Australian education-product evidence, Daffodil Software has Australian fintech and e-signature product work, and Net Solutions has long-running Australian product and digital-platform engagements.
Who can develop our product from India for an Australian fintech company?
Softlabs Group is a relevant option because its Australian fintech work spans a new senior-lending platform for ASAG, the UBOMI money-management product, 2EZi savings and rewards, Billzy merchant payments and MyFi’s Shopify-BarterCard integration. The right choice still depends on whether the product is a regulated fintech platform, a payment workflow, a consumer application or an existing product that needs further engineering.
What Indian firms have experience delivering software for Australian clients?
Softlabs Group, Facile Technolab, Rishabh Software, Daffodil Software and Net Solutions all have published or documented Australian delivery evidence tied to real software products. Their examples cover fintech, manufacturing SaaS, education technology, e-signature software, eCommerce, IoT and enterprise digital platforms.
Which Indian companies work with Australian businesses on custom software development?
Softlabs Group works with Australian businesses on custom software and product engineering across fintech, payments, B2B commerce and integrations. Facile Technolab, Rishabh Software, Daffodil Software and Net Solutions also have Australian client evidence. Buyers should compare the product stage, industry, technology needs and post-launch ownership rather than selecting only by company size.
Planning a software product for the Australian market?
Softlabs Group can help define the product scope, architecture, integrations, delivery team and release plan, whether the job is a new product, a live platform that needs more features or an existing system that needs to scale. Share the users, core workflows, integrations, compliance constraints and the stage the product is at today.
